Web wicca.cnbeyer.com

Click here for the
original document.

 

 

 

Home          Wicca 101/FAQ          Glossary           About the Author          Email the Author       Blog / Question of the Day        Email List
Wiccan Basics

The God and Goddess
   Triple Goddess
   Horned God
   Goddess Worship
   Historical Deities
Wiccan Rede
The Law of Return
Magic and Spellcasting
The Circle
The Pentagram
Organization
Book of Shadows
The Elements
Working Tools
Wheel of the Year

Craft Names

Essays
click for more links
Liturgy, Laws & Dogmas
click for more links
Myth and History
Why Bad History Matters
Myth of Matriarchy
The Really Old Religion
   Murray's Unlikely Theory
Power of Pagan Women
The Christian Church
The Burning Times
The Real History of Wicca
Miscellaneous
Wiccans, Witches,
Pagans and Magicians

What is a Fluffy Bunny?
Links
Books
 

13 Principles of Belief, Retort
by Aldous Tyler

I sympathise with you, for, sometime not so long ago, I too was under a number of misconceptions about what it meant to be "pagan" or a "witch". So, in only the interest of your further education, I will point out the inaccuracies in the Council of American Witches only surviving document:

We practice rites to attune ourselves with the natural rhythm of life forces marked by the phases of the Moon and the seasonal quarters and cross-quarters.

We recognize that our intelligence gives us a unique responsibility toward our environment. We seek to live in harmony with Nature, in ecological balance offering fulfillment to life and consciousness within an evolutionary concept.
Firstly, I am afraid that there are many pagans and witches who do nothing even approximating the above two points. I, for one, hold no ceremony based on the rhythms of nature for myself. There is simply no need. No matter where I am, I feel the change of seasons and day into night and back again. Marking each with ceremony is thus a completely unneeded act. I might do so if I feel like it, but that's as far as it goes.

On the second point, there are those of us who are not terribly environmentalist in our day to day lives or attitudes. I've seen plenty of purely Wiccan events where styrofoam plates and cups were used and tossed into the landfill-bound recepticles at the end. Are these folks not true Wiccans? Of course they are. They just don't happen to be in compliance with this concept.

This, of course, says nothing about the fact that personally, I feel that our intelligence gives us the unique responsibility to not take anything as holy writ, such as these "rules". Let's face it, we won't hurt nature if we wipe ourselves and every other living thing off this planet. It will begin again, quite happy to be rid of us. It started without life, it can start again if we eliminate it. In fact, I don't believe that any harsh conditions we might impose on this planet, such as radiation, chemical poisoning or the like, will keep it from forming new life. By all accounts, the conditions under which the first life formed the first time around were very harsh and unprotected. It might take our planet up to a hundred thousand years or more to get around to creating new life, but in the lifespan of a planet, that's the blink of an eye. No, I do not buy into the "save the Earth" concept at all. The Earth will be fine. It US we might want to save.

We acknowledge a depth of power far greater than is apparent to the average person. Because it is far greater than ordinary, it is sometimes called "supernatural," but we see it as lying within that which is naturally potential to all.
Interestingly, I know a number of Wiccans who do not perorm magick, or believe it exists outside the psychological thoughtforms that human beings can deceive themselves with. Yes, I think these folks are in denial, but I won't go so far as to call them "un-Wiccan".
We conceive of the Creative Power of the Universe as manifesting through polarity--as masculine and feminine--and that this same creative Power lives in all people, and functions through the interaction of the masculine and feminine. We value neither above the other knowing each to be supportive of the other. We value sexuality as pleasure, as the symbol and embodiment of Life, and as one of the sources of energies used in magickal practice and religious worship.
Ah, now, if only this were true. It would be nice if all Wiccans, much less all Witches, were gender balanced in their approach to spirituality. But just ask the Dianics or other radical feminist Wiccans, and you'll find that the divine male is barely there, if mentioned at all. These folks are Wiccan. These folks are Witches. Once more we see that this document, closing in on thirty years of age, has little basis in reality, and no hold on those who practice either the religion of Wicca or one of the many magickal systems called "Witchcraft".
We recognize both outer worlds and inner, or psychological worlds-- sometimes known as the Spiritual World, the Collective Unconscious, the Inner Planes, etc.--and we see in the interaction of these two dimensions the basis for paranormal phenomena and magickal exercises. We neglect neither dimension for the other, seeing both as necessary for our fulfillment.
As I said above, there are plenty on both sides of this one who do not recognise a balance between the psychological and the "outer" metaphysical.
We do not recognize any authoritarian hierarchy, but do honor those who teach, respect those who share their greater knowledge and wisdom, and acknowledge those who have courageously given of themselves in leadership.
This has never been close to accurate, as what of the High Priest and Priestess roles in many Wiccan covens? What of the degrees (1st, 2nd, 3rd, and for some, more)? This statement should never have been adopted into this document by any sane Wiccan of any time period. Gardner, the founder of the religon, knew better.
We see religion, magick, and wisdom-in-living as being united in the way one views the world and lives within it--a world view and philosophy of life, which we identify as Witchcraft or the Wiccan Way.

Calling oneself "Witch" does not make a Witch--but neither does heredity itself, or the collecting of titles, degrees, and initiations. A Witch seeks to control the forces within him/herself that make life possible in order to live wisely and well, without harm to others, and in harmony with Nature.
And here we have yet again the misconception that to be Wiccan you must practice magick. This is simply not true. But here, we now see the fundamental ignorance in this document, for not all Witches are Wiccan. There are plenty who practice Witchcraft, who follow no set religion at all, or even follow Christianity, Judaism or another, non-Wiccan faith. And that doesn't beign to account for the followers of Anton Lavey. And again, not all Wiccans are mindful of the concept of "harming none"- many shrug this tired writ off as useless, given that it is impossible to harm no one or nothing and still exist.
We acknowledge that it is the affirmation and fulfillment of life, in a continuation of evolution and development of consciousness, that gives meaning to the Universe we know, and to our personal role within it.
A fine sentiment, but one not commonly seen outside of this document.
Our only animosity toward Christianity, or toward any other religion or philosophy-of-life is to the extent that its institutions have claimed to be "the one true right and only way" and have sought to deny freedom to others and to suppress other ways of religious practices and belief.
Gerald Garder himself held more animosity towards Christianty than this, and by comparison to some of the anti-Christian rhetoric we see flying from the mouths of neophytes and elders everywhere, Gardner was NICE. This belonged in a document of Wiccan principles like mustard belongs in a milkshake.
As Witches, we are not threatened by debates on the history of the Craft, the origins of various terms, the legitimacy of various aspects of different traditions. We are concerned with our present, and our future.
Ahh, and this is why so many Wiccans, unschooled in the origin of their religion, visciously attack anyone who tells them that the only amount of millenia that Wicca has existed for is approximately 0.06? This was simply adopted to hide the fact that many less scooled Wiccans and other pagans (I was in this latter category some time ago) think that the age of a religion somehow makes it better.
We do not accept the concept of "absolute evil," nor do we worship any entity known as "Satan" or "the Devil" as defined by Christian Tradition. We do not seek power through the suffering of others, nor do we accept the concept that personal benefits can only be derived by denial to another.
The two ironic things about this passage is that
A) Laveyan Satanists are a kind of Witch (note, I did not say "a form of WICCAN"), so the passages about "absolute evil" and "Satan" are ill-applied, and
B) In making this list of rules, the writers are engaging in the concept of personal benefits being derived by denial to another. Rules are as rules do, and that includes setting boundaries that define one thing as better or truer than another.
We work within Nature for that which is contributory to our health and well-being.
As does everyone, pagan, Wiccan, Witch or not. Nature isn't just the woods, or some remote mountaintop, nor is it only the yummy raspberry. Nature is also the poisonous hemlock, the form of communal hive-shelter we human beings call cities, and the chemicals we produce from things that came from this earth. It's ALL nature, and everyone works with it tocontribute to thier health and well-being. They simply don't agree on what that is, most often.

I hope this helps illuminate why many Wiccans, witches of other kinds and pagans find this list of rules to ahve been flawed from the beginning and not applicable to them. I am personally sorry to see that it was authored here in Minneapolis, but that does give me one unique perspective on it- no one I know around here would sign a document like this today.

Sincerely,
Aldous Tyler

© Catherine Noble Beyer, 2002 - 2011   *     Awards